Friday, June 14, 2013

What is the Status of the Transvaginal Mesh Litigation?

Thousands of women underwent surgical procedures to repair pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence over the past seven or eight years, believing those procedures to be safe. Unfortunately, those same women were dismayed to find that the mesh implanted in their bodies turned out to cause erosion, the formation of adhesions or fistula, extrusion, infection, shortening of the vagina, nerve injury or the formation of scar tissues resulting in mesh contraction. These women have suffered extreme pain, loss of spousal consortium, loss of wages, huge medical expenses, and an overall loss of quality of life due to a faulty product which was not properly tested prior to marketing.

 

Because a good portion of the transvaginal lawsuits filed across America propose many of the same allegations against mesh manufacturers, a judicial panel assigned over twelve thousand cases to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Lawsuits have been grouped in MDLs involving comparable claims against common defendants in order to handle them more proficiently. The judge assigned to this District Court is Chief Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. Judge Goodwin will be hearing cases against C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc. and Coloplast Corporation.

 

Trial preparation for the first case began in February, 2013, with the second scheduled trial set to begin in December, 2013. Judge Goodwin has stated he will limit the number of days for each trial in order to expedite the process. In state trials two women have received sizeable verdicts for their mesh injuries. Last July Christine Scott was awarded $5.5 million dollars in California after enduring nine revision surgeries. In February, 2013, Linda Gross was awarded $11.11 million from a New Jersey jury in her lawsuit against Ethicon brand after undergoing eighteen surgeries. The New Jersey jury found a failure to warn as well as fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of Johnson & Johnson.

 

Currently AMS, Bard, Ethicon, Boston Scientific and Coloplast have MDLs pending in West Virgina, and Mitchell has an MDL pending in Georgia. There are state-consolidated actions across the country. At present there are two pending in New Jersey, one in Boston, one in California and a large number in Texas with two trial dates in Texas this June and July.  Some of the manufacturers are intertwined with others due to sales of products which took place over the years. Both Covidien and Sofradim manufacture the mesh used by Bard, therefore a Bard case has to look at the date of the specific product in order to determine which companies are liable.

 

Further, each manufacturer has multiple mesh products—some for stress urinary incontinence and others for pelvic organ prolapse. In other words, it is expected these mesh cases may get very complicated as attorneys attempt to sort out who is responsible for the harm done to thousands of women. Overall, there are more than 18,000 cases currently filed in MDLs, and that number may continue to rise as more women are coming forward to file suit against manufacturers of Transvaginal Mesh.

Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF JANUARY 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP