Andrew Sullo on Google+
Understanding the California Stryker Hip Statute of Limitations: Statutes of limitations are essentially deadlines for filing a lawsuit, and most lawsuits must be filed within a specified window of time, although those statutes differ from state to state. A Stryker hip lawsuit has a two-year statute of limitations in the state of California which starts running at the time your injury is discovered—or should have been discovered. The statute of limitations regarding your California Stryker hip lawsuit is extremely important. Equally important is having a highly qualified California Stryker hip lawyer as your advocate. Because the California Stryker hip statute of limitations can be complex, only an attorney who is extremely knowledgeable regarding the Stryker hip recall can assist you in determining whether you are entitled to file a California Stryker hip lawsuit.
Have You Been Harmed By the Stryker Hip Recall?
As the recipient of a Stryker Rejuvenate or ABGII hip implant device, you are likely aware of the Stryker hip recall which occurred in July, 2012. In April, 2012, Stryker issued an Urgent Field Safety Notification to hospitals and surgeons, stating the Rejuvenate and ABGII were more likely to experience fretting and corrosion, leading to the excess shearing of microscopic metal ions. These cobalt and chromium ions can stop in the tissue surrounding the hip implant, or can travel to the bloodstream where they wreak significant havoc in the body. When the ions burrow into hip tissues, chronic pain, severe inflammation, degradation and even death of tissue and bone, hip failure and the necessity of revision surgery can all occur. Cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream can cause any of the following adverse health issues:
· Loss of hearing and vision
· Gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal, thyroid and neurological disorders
· Reproductive issues
· DNA disruption
· The formation of pseudo-tumors
· Memory loss
· Anxiety, depression and irritability
· Skin rashes
· Fatigue and poor concentration
· Changes to skin and nails
· Atrophy of muscles
· Seizures, convulsions and tremors
What Stryker Knew Prior to the Stryker Hip Recall
As a resident of California who has been harmed by a defective Stryker hip implant, the California Stryker hip statute of limitations can have significant bearing on your ability to recover damages from Stryker. Within the first year following FDA approval of the Rejuvenate and ABGII, adverse reports began coming into the agency, both from physicians and from patients. In fact, in late 2010 and throughout 2011, a number of surgeons reported removing Stryker Rejuvenate or ABGII implants from their patients which showed a substance resembling “black rust.” Other surgeons noted the presence of a milky fluid in the soft tissues, massive metallosis symptoms and that these patients suffered extreme pain. By the first half of 2012, the number of adverse event reports submitted to the FDA had climbed to over 300. Despite the growing evidence that the Rejuvenate and ABGII had potentially very serious issues, Stryker continued to sell both models until the July, 2012 recall.
Stryker Hip Lawsuits
Over 1,700 lawsuits have been filed against Stryker, and attorneys knowledgeable about the recall believe that number will continue to rise as the statutes of limitations in some states near their end. As your California Stryker hip statute of limitations may be close, it is imperative you speak to a skilled California Stryker hip lawyer, whether you believe you have suffered injury at this point or not. Because of the extremely high rate of failure and problems associated with the Rejuvenate and ABGII, there is a good chance you will experience adverse health issues associated with the Stryker hip recall. Don’t wait—call a knowledgeable California Stryker hip lawyer today regarding the possibility of recovering damages through a California Stryker hip lawsuit.