Pseudotumors in Stryker Rejuvenate and Stryker ABGII Metal Hip Implant Recipients

November 25, 2016 - Pseudotumors can require Stryker Metal Hip Implant Revision Surgery - Many doctors believe patients who are particularly sensitive to cobalt and chromium and other heavy metals will be more likely to develop a pseudotumor than those who are not as sensitive. A Stryker hip pseudotumor can be accompanied by tissue and bone degradation and necrosis.  When the patient...
0 Comments

Why it’s Likely NOW OR NEVER for Stryker Hip Implant Recipients

May 16, 2016 - URGENT NOTICE FOR STRYKER HIP IMPLANT RECIPIENTS - As of this date, there is no second round of settlements as many thought there might be. Even if a second round is announced, it is likely that...This means there is a particular urgency for unrevised Stryker hip implant recipients. If you are one of these unrevised Stryker hip patients, there are two things you must do immediately. First, you must..
0 Comments

I am a Stryker Hip Implant Recipient and I Already Registered With Broadspire—Can I Still Hire a Lawyer?

May 12, 2016 - Did You Receive a Stryker Hip Broadspire Letter? Prior to the settlement agreement, many patients received a Stryker hip Broadspire letter. Broadspire is a third-party company brought in by Stryker to protect their interests. The Stryker hip Broadspire letter offered some level of compensation to those who were injured by a Rejuvenate or ABGII...

0 Comments

Update on Wyoming Stryker Hip Litigation

Update on Wyoming Stryker Hip Litigation

The Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII Hip Recalls and Subsequent Lawsuits

In July, 2012, Stryker Corporation issued a recall for the Rejuvenate and ABGII hip implants. These devices had been on the market barely more than two years at the time of the recall. When Stryker marketed the implants, they claimed the devices would be perfect for the younger, more active patient. The design of the two Stryker implants was extremely unique, in that there were a variety of stem and neck pieces in different lengths and angles, allowing surgeons to custom-fit the device to the patient according to body size, gender and level of activity. The design also implemented a ceramic, rather than a metal ball, which Stryker claimed made it much safer than other metal-on-metal hip implants, and less likely to shed cobalt and chromium metal ion debris due to Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII fretting and corrosion. 

0 Comments

Update on Wisconsin Stryker Hip Litigation

Update on Wisconsin Stryker Hip Litigation

The Status of the Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII Hip Lawsuits

If your are the recipient of a Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII hip implant, you likely heard of the Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII hip recalls in July, 2012. Despite the fact that Stryker had marketed both devices as being safer than other metal-on-metal hip implants (due to the use of a ceramic ball) and much longer lasting that most all other hip implants, these claims turned out to be less than accurate. Shortly after the two devices were released in early 2010, adverse event reports began coming in to the FDA. These adverse event reports came from consumers and surgeons alike. In fact, several surgeons notified the FDA that they noted a substance which looked like “black rust” on Stryker Rejuvenate/ABGII hip implants removed from their patients. 

0 Comments
RSS
245678910Last

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF JANUARY 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP