Thursday, October 27, 2016

Third Missouri Jury Awards Substantial Verdict in Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit

October 28, 2016 - For the third time in less than a year, jurors in Missouri have hit pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson with a substantial verdict. This verdict, like the last two, concerns the ovarian cancer dangers associated with baby powder with talc. The safety of talc has been under debate since the 1980’s, and while Johnson & Johnson could have swapped out their baby powder with talc for baby powder with cornstarch—as most other companies which manufacture baby powder have long since done—Johnson & Johnson simply continued to sell their talc product alongside a cornstarch version.

 

Talc Fiber Migration

The facts which came to light in the last two Johnson & Johnson baby powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, as well as this latest talc powder claim, include the theory of talc fiber migration. In the early 1970’s, British medical researchers found deeply embedded talc fibers in ten out of thirteen tissue samples taken from women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Researchers since that time have theorized talc fiber migration occurs when women use talcum powder for feminine hygiene; the fibers travel up through the vagina and the uterus, through the fallopian tubes, and into the ovaries where they embed themselves, causing significant levels of inflammation. Inflammation is a well-known factor in many different types of cancers, including ovarian cancer.

 

Plaintiff Deborah Giannecchini Receives Substantial Award in Baby Powder Lawsuit

Plaintiff Deborah Giannecchini was awarded economic damages, non-economic compensatory damages, and punitive damages. The talc supplier, Imerys Talc America Inc. was ordered to pay punitive damages to Giannecchini as well. Giannecchini has had her spleen, part of her stomach, part of her colon, her ovaries and her uterus all removed as a result of her ovarian cancer diagnosis. Like other defendants, Giannecchnini said she would not have used talcum powder for feminine hygiene if she had been aware of the risks.

 

Failure to Warn on the Part of Johnson & Johnson?

R. Allen Smith Jr., Giannecchini’s attorney, told jurors during closing arguments that Johnson & Johnson had not only joked about the potential baby powder cancer link, but also falsified medical records to hide the facts. One internal J & J document presented in Giannecchini’s trial—as well as the two prior trials—is a memo which suggested J & J would be compared to the cigarette industry if the company failed to warn women about the potential risks of using talcum powder in the genital region.

 

Johnson & Johnson Denies Link Between Talc and Ovarian Cancer

Johnson & Johnson has continued to maintain there is no solid link between talc and ovarian cancer, despite numerous scientific studies which concluded otherwise. As with the last two trials, J & J has vowed to appeal the decision. Imerys Talc America Inc., named in prior trials, but later dropped as a defendant, claims since they don’t market the products, but only supply the raw materials, they should not be a part of the J & J trials, although a spokeswoman agreed with J & J that talc is not a harmful substance.

 

Contacting a Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawyer

While Missouri jurors awarded damages in a wrongful death talcum powder ovarian cancer claim in February 2016, and damages in a personal injury claim filed by Gloria Ristesund a few months later, plaintiffs in New Jersey have not had the same level of success. In fact, last month a New Jersey judge tossed out two similar ovarian cancer lawsuits claiming there was insufficient scientific proof of a link between talc and ovarian cancer. If you have been diagnosed with baby powder cancer and you were unaware of the ovarian cancer dangers associated with talc, it could be beneficial to contact a baby powder ovarian cancer lawyer as soon as possible.
Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF JANUARY 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP