Denver, Colorado Talcum Powder Lawsuit Lawyer
Dangers Associated with Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder with Talc – Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder with talc was first manufactured in the 1890s. By the 1930s there were issues regarding the safety of talc fibers, as it was found that when talcum powder was used on surgical gloves, patient inflammation could result. By the 1980s, Harvard researchers found that women who regularly used talcum powder for feminine hygiene purposes, nearly doubled their risk for ovarian cancer.
At this time, most other manufacturers of talcum powder replaced the talc with cornstarch. While J & J also made a powder using cornstarch, they maintained the safety of their baby powder with talc and Shower to Shower with talc, and even stepped up marketing on these products. More recently, asbestos fibers in the talcum powder have also become an issue. In the 1950s, tremolite (one of the six minerals classified as asbestos) was found to have contaminated some talc samples, and by 1976 the FDA was determining limits on asbestos in cosmetic talc products.
At this time, J & J assured the FDA there was no asbestos in their talcum products, and because the FDA has little authority over cosmetics and beauty products, the issue seemed to face away. It is important to note that the World Health Organization recognizes no safe level of asbestos exposure.
Where Does the Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Litigation in Denver, Colorado Stand? The first lawsuit regarding baby powder ovarian cancer was filed against Johnson & Johnson in 2009 by Deane Berg. While Ms. Berg was offered a substantial confidential settlement, she turned the settlement down and went to trial. Berg was successful at trial yet was awarded no compensation. Since that time there have been a number of trials, with many plaintiffs being successful in their claim against J & J, yet the pharmaceutical giant continues to appeal these decisions, keeping the lawsuits tied up in court for years.
Very recently, a billion-dollar settlement awarded to 22 women in 2018 was upheld by a Missouri appeals court, but a J & J spokesperson claims they will appeal to the Supreme Court. In May, Johnson & Johnson pulled their powders containing talc from the United States and Canadian markets, claiming sales were down due to the publicity from the many baby powder ovarian cancer and talcum powder asbestos cancer trials. There are currently almost 20,000 lawsuits pending against Johnson & Johnson, with many of these lawsuits filed by women in the state of Colorado.
Have the Statutes of Limitations Passed for My Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Case? If you believe you may have a baby powder ovarian cancer claim or a talcum powder asbestos claim, you must be aware of the statutes of limitations. These statutes are different from state to state and dictate the amount of time you have to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer of a dangerous or defective product. The statutes of limitations can be impacted by a number of issues, so it is extremely important that you speak to a knowledgeable product liability attorney as quickly as possible. An experienced Denver, Colorado baby powder ovarian cancer attorney can help you determine whether you may file a claim against J & J.
How Could Consulting with a Denver, Colorado Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawyer Be Beneficial? If you or a loved one have received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, you could potentially benefit from filing a talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit. When you speak to an experienced baby powder ovarian cancer attorney from the Houston law firm of Sullo & Sullo, you can get the answers you need while your attorney comprehensively assesses the facts of your potential claim.
DISCLAIMER: Statutes of Limitations limit the amount of time that an individual has to file a lawsuit, and not only vary from state to state, but also vary by cause of action. The information provided above and in the state-specific pages in this section is meant as a general guide, and is for informational purposes only. Each client’s case is unique, and the specific circumstances of any individual case can have significant bearing on the applicable statute of limitations. Any person who believes they may have a viable cause of action is strongly encouraged to consult with an attorney about the statute of limitations for his or her case. Attorney Andrew Sullo is licensed to practice law in Texas, and can prosecute cases that are part of a federal multi-district litigation. Andrew Sullo does not practice law in any other state, and is not certified by the Boards of Legal Specialization in any state. Not all states have board certifications. This information is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of Texas. Our firm is not accepting cases in any state where it would be impermissible for it to do so. Sullo & Sullo, LLP maintains its principal office in Houston, Texas.
