MENU

Connecticut State SOL for Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits 

Talcum Powder Dangers

Women across America are likely feeling considerable anxiety following the first three Johnson & Johnson trials, all of which were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The jury foreman from the second J & J trial—in which the family of Jacqueline Fox sued J & J for wrongful death, claiming that internal J & J documents provided the most incriminating evidence against the pharmaceutical giant, saying “It was really clear they were hiding something.” Just what has Johnson & Johnson been hiding, potentially for decades regarding the link between ovarian cancer and the use of talcum powder for feminine hygiene? J & J denies any safety concerns associated with talcum powder, therefore determining no warnings were required.

 

The jurors in all three trials appeared to feel differently, particularly in the Fox trial which was decided in February, 2016, and the Ristesund trial, decided in May, 2016. In both cases, jurors awarded large punitive damages–$62 million and $50 million, respectively. Punitive damages are generally awarded when a jury feels the defendant has deliberately caused harm to the plaintiff. A considerable body of research, amassed since the 1970’s, has concluded there is a 30-40 percent increased risk of ovarian cancer among women who regularly use talcum powder for feminine hygiene. Since an estimated 40 percent of American women do use talcum powder almost daily, in the genital region, many, many women may now be at risk of being diagnosed with ovarian cancer.  

 

Understanding the Connecticut Ovarian Baby Powder Cancer State Statute of Limitations

Each state operates under statutes of limitations. These statutes determine the length of time an injured person has to bring a product liability claim against the manufacturer of a dangerous or defective product. Some states specify this time period will begin accruing on the date of the actual injury, others add a statute of repose. A state’s statute of repose will bar a cause of action which is not brought within a specific time period following a defined “event.”

 

Some of these tolling events include: the date the alleged defective product was initially manufactured, delivered, purchased or sold. Because statutes of limitations and statutes of repose can be very complex, it can be beneficial to have an experience ovarian talcum powder cancer attorney to help you interpret these statutes correctly. The state of Connecticut’s statute of limitations says an action must be brought within three years from the time the injury is discovered—or should have been discovered. Connecticut also has a ten-year statute of repose which begins to run once the manufacturer or seller has “last parted” with the product. 

 

How the Connecticut Statute of Limitations Applies to Ovarian Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuits

Perhaps you are one of the many women who was unaware of the dangers associated with talcum powder. If so, you may have received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer many years ago, yet had no idea that diagnosis could be related to the use of talcum powder for feminine hygiene. It is important to remember the discovery rule as it applies to these baby powder ovarian cancer lawsuits. Theoretically, your ovarian baby powder cancer state statute of limitations in the state of Connecticut should not begin to run until one of the following occurs:

 

·         You discover your talc cancer injury was caused by J & J;

·         J & J admits there is an issue with their talc products;

·         The FDA issues a talcum powder warning;

·         The FDA issues a talcum powder recall, or

·         You “discover” via a scanning electron microscope imaging study, there are talc fibers present in your ovarian tissues.

 

The Particular Problems of Ovarian Cancer Diagnoses Made More Than Ten Years Ago

If your diagnosis of ovarian cancer occurred more than ten years ago, you could face additional problems based on the fact that federal law requires healthcare institutions to keep tissue samples only for ten years—after this time period, they are typically destroyed. If this is the true in your case, it is even more important that you contact an ovarian talcum powder cancer attorney who will send a preservation letter on your behalf to prevent destruction of your diagnostic pathology samples. In short, it can be extremely difficult to determine, on your own, whether your ovarian baby powder cancer state statute of limitations has run, without the assistance of an experienced ovarian baby powder cancer attorney.

 

Getting Help from a Connecticut Ovarian Talcum Powder Cancer Attorney

A knowledgeable baby powder cancer attorney can work hard on your potential case to help ensure all deadlines are met in a timely manner. If you believe you may have missed your time deadline for filing an ovarian talcum powder claim, don’t lose hope. Contact a talcum powder ovarian cancer attorney as soon as possible in order to explore all options, and pursue compensation for your injuries.  You may be entitled to medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. If you are a resident of one of the following locales in Connecticut and have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using Johnson & Johnson baby powder with talc for feminine hygiene, you are encouraged to contact a Connecticut ovarian talcum powder cancer attorney.

 

·         Bridgeport, Connecticut

·         New Haven, Connecticut

·         Hartford, Connecticut

·         Stamford, Connecticut

·         Waterbury, Connecticut

·         Norwalk, Connecticut

·         Danbury, Connecticut

·         New Britain, Connecticut

 

DISCLAIMER: Statutes of Limitations limit the amount of time that an individual has to file a lawsuit, and not only vary from state to state, but also vary by cause of action. The information provided above and in the state-specific pages in this section is meant as a general guide, and is for informational purposes only. Each client’s case is unique, and the specific circumstances of any individual case can have significant bearing on the applicable statute of limitations. Any person who believes they may have a viable cause of action is strongly encouraged to consult with an attorney about the statute of limitations for his or her case. Attorney Andrew Sullo is licensed to practice law in Texas, and can prosecute cases that are part of a federal multi-district litigation. Andrew Sullo does not practice law in any other state, and is not certified by the Boards of Legal Specialization in any state. Not all states have board certifications. This information is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of Texas. Our firm is not accepting cases in any state where it would be impermissible for it to do so. Sullo & Sullo, LLP maintains its principal office in Houston, Texas.

Free Case Review

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Are you a Sullo client?*
Preferred Language*
WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

Awards

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION

(800) 730-7607

Google Reviews

Angel R
8 hours ago
Hello, I would like to sincerely thank the attorneys and the entire team at Sullo & Sullo for your professional service and assistance with my traffic ticket. I truly appreciate the time, effort, and professionalism you provided throughout the process. I attended court, and I’m very grateful that everything was handled successfully and that my ticket was dismissed. Thank you again for your excellent service and for making the process much easier and less stressful for me. I really appreciate your help and would gladly recommend your firm to anyone who needs professional legal assistance. Thank you very much!
Natalia Vasquez
12 hours ago
👍👍👍, buen servicio, me ayududaron con mi caso, 100%
Sergio Perez
14 hours ago
CHARLES PISERELLE
2 days ago
Phillip Payter is an outstanding attorney. I thought my case would easily get dismissed but for whatever reasons it did not a first. I sat down verily and talked with Mr. Payter and explained what happened. He assured me he would not give up and after talking with prosecutors he was able to get it dismissed. Law enforcement doesn’t always have their details pit together, these guys will make sure they do! Thank you Sullo&Sullo and Thank you Phillip!
Response from the owner:Charles, what a ride that must have been, thinking dismissal was coming and then hitting that unexpected wall. It means a lot to hear that Phillip sat down with you, listened to the whole story, and refused to let it go. Getting that case dismissed after prosecutors were already involved says everything about how hard he worked for you. We'll absolutely pass your words along to Phillip. Thank you for sharing this.
Theodore Faulkner
5 days ago
Thank you for your service.
Response from the owner:Theodore, those words mean a lot to the lawyers at Sullo & Sullo Attorneys at Law. Thank you for taking a moment to share that.
Jesse Macias
5 days ago
Hired Sullo & Sullo attorneys to help with a couple tickets, allegedly speeding and running a red light. After having the initial court dates reset, I had my day in court and yo my surprise, they both got dismissed. Attorney Phillip J. Payter was outstanding. I will definitely be using them again IF I ever get another ticket.
Response from the owner:Jesse, getting both of those dismissed on the same day in court had to be a great feeling, and it sounds like Phillip made the whole process a lot easier than you were expecting. We'll make sure he hears about this. Here's hoping you don't need us again, but it's good to know you know where to find the legal team at Sullo & Sullo Attorneys at Law if you do!
G-RIDE2 SOUTHSIDE
6 days ago
Absolutely professional and priority lawyers Thanks
Response from the owner:That means a lot to hear, and we're glad the legal team at Sullo & Sullo Attorneys at Law delivered on both counts. Thanks for taking a moment to share that.