Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Are the Dissimilar Metals Used in the Stryker Rejuvenate the Key to its Failure?

The Stryker Rejuvenate and ABGII were recalled in July, 2012, after a significant number of implant recipients developed serious medical problems from the hip device. Stryker changed the design of these two models substantially; rather than using a cobalt and chromium ball, they used a ceramic ball and instead of a single modularity device the company designed a dual modularity device which offered surgeons many more options when placing the implant. With a variety of component sizes, surgeons were able to custom fit each hip implant device to the patient’s body size and type as well as to their level of activity. The Stryker Rejuvenate and ABGII were specifically marketed toward the younger, more active patients, and prospective recipients who had heard about the release of metal ions into the hip tissue and bloodstream when a metal ball was used felt like they were choosing a much safer alternative.

 

Why Dissimilar Metals Cause Excess Corrosion

When Stryker recalled the Rejuvenate and ABGII, they cited a higher-than-normal risk of fretting and corrosion which generates metal ion debris and can lead to metal toxicity and failure of the hip implant. More recently it has been found that a serious mismatch between the titanium stem portion and the cobalt and chromium neck which may be responsible for the high levels of metal ion release. The titanium stem is coated with a blend of titanium, molybdenum, zirconium and iron mixed with a plasma spray.

 

Studies done over a decade ago found corrosion to be significantly higher in hip implants which used dissimilar metals versus those components which are constructed of the same metal. In fact, 42% of mixed metal hip implants showed moderate to severe corrosion while only 28% of those constructed from one metal showed the same levels of moderate to severe corrosion. A more recent study showed a galvanic reaction occurred when a titanium stem and a chromium and cobalt adapter sleeve were mixed, likely because cobalt and chromium are much harder metals.

 

Additional Reasons for the Failure of the Rejuvenate and ABGII

Stryker’s Rejuvenate and ABGII may also be subject to undue frictional torque. Where the modular neck and stem meet, frictional torque leads to more wear on the joint. This happens to be a joint that is not supposed to suffer undue wear, therefore this is one more reason the recalled Rejuvenate and ABGI have caused problems in recipients. Excessive wear on a joint can be responsible for the formation of pseudo-tumors as well as total failure of the hip implant. The excess wear on the joint junctures as well as the dissimilar metals can cause metal ions to build up in the bloodstream and hip tissues causing loss of hearing and vision, vertigo, depression, anxiety and irritability, skin disorders, DNA disruption, cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, renal and thyroid disorders, some forms of cancer, reproductive issues and loss of memory. 

 

Further, when the hip implant fails and revision surgery is required, the Rejuvenate holds the distinction of requiring the lengthiest, riskiest and most difficult revision surgery. The stem must be pried loose from the femur which comes with the possibility of femur fracturing or shattering. The patient is required to undergo a lengthy recovery period, meaning they are losing their regular paycheck in addition to having to pay extensive medical expenses.

Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP