Wednesday, February 20, 2013

The First DePuy ASR Trial: Kransky v. DePuy

The first DePuy ASR hip implant trial began on January 25th in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County. The case, Kransky v. DePuy, revolves around Loren Kransky, a 65-year old man who received a DePuy ASR hip implant in 2007 and was forced to undergo revision surgery just five years later, in 2012. Kransky’s case is the first of over 10,000 DePuy lawsuits to see the inside of a courtroom. The plaintiff, a former corrections officer, alleges that he suffered serious adverse health effects as a result of heavy metal poisoning from the DePuy, Johnson & Johnson all-metal hip implant. According to Counsel Financial, Johnson & Johnson has attributed the health issues suffered by Mr. Kransky to a long history of smoking, exposure to the chemical Agent Orange while serving in Vietnam as well as pre-existing heart and kidney disease. It is expected that Johnson & Johnson and DePuy will counter all allegations of harm by seeking to attribute those negative health effects to other issues in the plaintiffs’ lives.

 

Allegations by Kransky’s Attorneys

Kransky’s attorneys countered that both DePuy and its parent company Johnson & Johnson were well aware of the ASR’s design defects. A former DePuy Product Manager stated that DePuy neglected to warn surgeons that the failure rate of the ASR was at least eight times that of other similar metal-on-metal implants. The cup of the ASR is shallower than other cups, leading to excessive wear which is known to cause friction and release toxic metals into the body. A toxicologist who testified on behalf of Kransky stated the metal ions in his bloodstream were from seven to eight times the exposure levels allowed by the California Poison Control Department.

 

E-mail Concerns Prior to the DePuy ASR Recall

According to Bloomberg News, almost a year prior to the 93,000 DePuy ASR implants being recalled a DePuy marketing executive sent an e-mail detailing safety concerns regarding the ASR, asking DePuy and Johnson and Johnson to consider a recall. This marketing executive stated that “…I still remain concerned with the safety of this product…I do not make product safety decisions but I do have an obligation as an employee of Johnson & Johnson and DePuy to make it known when I do not feel comfortable.”

 

Metallosis Concerns

Mr. Kransky’s physician has testified that he was convinced Kransky would die from toxicity if the defective hip were not removed. Kransky’s cobalt levels prior to the revision surgery were over fifty micrograms per liter, dropping to 5 micrograms following the surgery.  Even the FDA has recently issued updated guidelines regarding all metal-on-metal hip implants, recommending specific metal ion testing for any recipient of an all-metal implant who has experienced adverse health effects. Some of the more common effects from all-metal hip implants include pain, inflammation, difficulty in walking or other physical activity, popping and creaking sounds coming from the implant, metallosis due to high levels of cobalt and chromium in the bloodstream and failure of the implant requiring revision surgery.

 

Testimony from Johnson & Johnson Bioengineer

The trial, which is currently in its fourth week, has more recently seen a Johnson & Johnson bioengineer offer testimony which stated that he redesigned the ASR, finding a way to lower the levels of cobalt and chromium ion release however these changes were never implemented. In fact, this bioengineer wrote to a superior as far back as 2008 stating that “a small improvement to geometry could represent a large improvement for many patients.” By removing the groove on the ASR cup the wear and tear would be approximately three times less than the original design yet these relatively simple design changes were never implemented, presumably because of financial considerations. Jurors also heard an expert witness testify that the ASR had many design defects which resulted in the implant failing at a much higher rate than other all-metal hip implants, primarily due to the shape of the cup which has less than half a circle as well as particularly thin walls—both of which are believed to have contributed to the defective implant.

 

The Fourth Week of the Kransky v. DePuy Trial

Now in its fourth week, jurors heard testimony from the Plaintiff, Loren Kransky, as well as from his daughter, Jennifer Lynn regarding how her father’s health had deteriorated since he received the ASR implant. Kransky stated he felt he was being poisoned as he was in constant pain, unable to walk and truly believed that while the revision surgery would likely kill him it was the “lesser of two evils.” There are currently over 6,200 individual DePuy ASR lawsuits which have been consolidated in a federal court in Toledo, Ohio.

 

The first two MDL trials are scheduled to begin on May 6, 2013 and July 8, 2013. Thousands of others harmed by the ASR metal hip implant have decided to forgo federal court and bring their ASR lawsuit in state court. The first ASR trial was slated to begin in a Nevada state court on December 3, 2012, however in late August the three plaintiffs settled for approximately $200,000 each. Loren Kransky’s trial is the next DePuy ASR state trial to take place. The trial is expected to last another week and will likely set the tone for all the DePuy ASR lawsuits to follow.

Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP