Friday, November 25, 2016

The Most Notable Studies on Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Dangers Between 1992 and 2003

November 25, 2016 - If you are a woman in the United States, you may have considerable anxiety regarding the latest baby powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in which Johnson & Johnson was found liable. In the first Johnson & Johnson talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit, held in South Dakota, the jury found that J & J was guilty of negligence for failing to warn plaintiff Deane Berg of the risks of ovarian cancer when their baby powder with talc is used for feminine hygiene. In a puzzling verdict, however, Berg was awarded no damages.  During Berg’s 2013 trial, Johnson & Johnson medical experts dismissed the idea that talc was responsible for her cancer, calling it “biologically implausible.”

 

The presence of talc fibers in her ovarian tumor was explained as “contamination,” which the medical experts said was common in hospitals. Unfortunately, that explanation could hardly account for the 1971 study by British researchers, which found talc fibers deeply embedded in the ovarian tissues of ten out of thirteen women who had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Other studies also linked the use of talcum powder for feminine hygiene to ovarian cancer.

 

Studies Linking Talcum Powder to Ovarian Cancer

In 1992, the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology published a study which concluded women who used baby powder with talc, on a weekly basis for feminine hygiene, were increasing their risk of developing ovarian cancer threefold. Two years later, the Cancer Prevention Coalition asked that the FDA require warnings on the labeling of talcum powder which would tell women that when talcum powder is used for feminine hygiene, the risks of ovarian cancer are increased. The FDA claimed there was insufficient evidence to require such a warning, and Johnson & Johnson refused to issue the warnings voluntarily. In 1997, the American Journal of Epidemiologyaffirmed that when talcum powder was used in the perineal region, the risks of ovarian cancer increased.

 

In 1999, Dr. Daniel Cramer, one of the early pioneers in the studies of talcum powder and ovarian cancer as well as an advocate for warning women of the risks of talcum powder, worked with other authors in a baby powder ovarian cancer study. The authors concluded that when talcum powder was used for feminine hygiene, as many as ten percent of the ovarian cancer diagnoses each year could be attributed to that use. Cramer and his co-authors estimated as many as 2,000 cases of ovarian cancer each year could be tied to the use of baby powder with talc, and that women should be warned of the risks. Many years earlier Cramer was visited by a senior scientist from Johnson & Johnson who, Cramer claimed, spent the entire time attempting to convince Cramer that the use of talcum powder was a harmless habit.

 

In 2003, a meta-analysis compiled and reviewed data from sixteen prior talcum powder ovarian cancer studies. This meta-analysis was published in Anticancer Research, and concluded that the perineal use of baby powder could increase the risk of ovarian cancer by 33 percent. It appears that, despite J & J claims to the contrary, many studies have found a definitive link between the use of talcum powder for feminine hygiene, and ovarian cancer. If you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and you are wondering whether that diagnosis is related to your use of Johnson & Johnson baby powder with talc or Shower to Shower with talc, it could be beneficial to speak to a knowledgeable baby powder ovarian cancer attorney as soon as possible.

Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF JANUARY 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP