Monday, January 27, 2014

What Went Wrong With the Stryker Rejuvenate?

The Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant device, along with the Stryker ABGII, was recalled in July, 2012. It was noted at the time the Stryker Rejuvenate was recalled that the device had a higher-than-normal risk of fretting and corrosion, particularly at the neck juncture and underneath the metal trunnions. Since the recall, more and more information has come to light regarding the Stryker Rejuvenate and the design flaws which may be responsible for the accumulation of metal ion debris in the bodies of Stryker Rejuvenate patients.

The design of the Stryker Rejuvenate was considered extremely innovative and was believed to be a much safer alternative to the “true” metal-on-metal hip implants, in part because a ceramic ball was used. Surgeons were able to choose different lengths and angles of the individual components in order to better match the implant to the individual patient’s body type and activity level. The Stryker Rejuvenate has a longer stem than the ABGII—a design that has led to more problems when revision surgery becomes necessary. The longer stem is planted deeply within the femur bone of the implant recipient during the original surgery. Should the patient develop metallosis or metal toxicity and a revision become necessary, the stem in many cases must literally be pried out of the femur.

Stryker Rejuvenate revision surgeries have been known to result in a shattered femur bone, and the necessity of rebuilding the bone before a new implant can be placed. The coating on the Stryker Rejuvenate, hydroxyapatite, is porous, rough and deep. This encourages the bone to grow more deeply into the coating, however once again, should a revision surgery be necessary, it is more difficult to remove the defective Stryker Rejuvenate. Other problems of the Stryker Rejuvenate include mismatched components and frictional torque. More than one study has shown that when metal alloys are mixed, corrosion may be much more likely where the metals come together.

A galvanic reaction which creates corrosion when the titanium stem and cobalt and chromium adapter sleeve meet has also been noted in the Stryker Rejuvenate. Although researchers are not entirely sure why this galvanic reaction occurs, studies have proven that a significantly increased level of cobalt ion debris sheds from the hip device when the components of an implant have mixed alloys—like the Stryker Rejuvenate. The metal ions which shear away from the Stryker Rejuvenate following corrosion, either lodge in the hip tissue or enter the bloodstream. Those Stryker Rejuvenate ions which burrow into the hip tissue can cause inflammation, infection, chronic pain, loss of bone and degradation of tissue—all of which can be responsible for total hip failure.

The ions which enter the bloodstream can cause gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular, thyroid, renal and neurological disorders, skin problems, hearing and vision loss, disruption of DNA, vertigo, memory loss, depression, anxiety and irritability and the formation of pseudo-tumors. These Stryker Rejuvenate symptoms are known collectively as metal toxicity or metal poisoning and are extremely serious. Those who have been implanted with a recalled Stryker Rejuvenate must see their physician and have tests to determine whether their cobalt and chromium levels are unduly high. It could also be in the best interests of Stryker Rejuvenate recipients to speak to an experienced product liability attorney in order to determine the best way to recoup medical expenses and lost wages due to the defective Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant.

Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF JANUARY 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP