Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Recall: Why the Rejuvenate Hip Implant May Be the Most Dangerous on the Market

Many doctors as well as patients believed the Stryker Rejuvenate was a much safer alternative to the all-metal hip implants such as the DePuy Pinnacle or ASR. Metal-on-metal hip implants consist of a metal ball and acetabular cup. When the recipient of an all-metal implant engages in physical activities, these two metal surfaces rub against one another, causing tiny metal ions to shear away, lodging in surrounding tissues or entering the bloodstream. Because of the relatively large metal surfaces rubbing against one another, the levels of cobalt and chromium ions can reach truly dangerous levels.

The Rejuvenate, on the other hand, implements a ceramic ball which was thought to prevent this metal ion release. When the Rejuvenate was recalled in July, 2012, Stryker stated a risk of corrosion and fretting at the neck juncture which could lead to the release of metal ions into the body. Later, it was discovered that the metal trunnions, located on either end of the neck piece of the implant could trap body fluids beneath them, also leading to corrosion. Any area which experiences corrosion experiences the release of toxic metals into the body. Because the metal surfaces which can suffer corrosion are much smaller in the Rejuvenate it would seem that it is still a safer alternative, however there is a major flaw in this belief.

Should a Pinnacle all-metal hip implant require revision surgery due to high levels of cobalt and chromium or excess pain, the surgical procedure is relatively simple and takes less than an hour. The person is opened up and the metal liner is removed and replaced with a plastic liner. While all operations have potential risks, this one is relatively safe, quick and easy. Should the ASR all-metal hip implant fail or the patient experiences high levels of metals or chronic pain, the revision surgery is more complicated than for the Pinnacle, but still relatively safe and easy: The patient is opened up and the acetabular cup is replaced. Should there be bone in growth into the cup, then the surgeon would be required to grind the cup out, making the surgical procedure both more complex as well as more painful with a longer recovery time.

However, neither of these surgeries require the surgeon to even touch the stem of the implant which is generally implanted deeply into the femoral bone during the original hip replacement surgery. Should the Rejuvenate require revision surgery, the stakes go up dramatically. Because of the location of the metal trunnions, the entire Rejuvenate implant must be removed during revision surgery. This requires the surgeon to dig the stem out of the femur—an act which can result in fracturing or shattering of the femur. Should the femur shatter the surgeon will be required to put it back together with metal bands—if it is possible to put it back together at all.

The typical Rejuvenate revision surgery lasts from four to five hours—assuming there are no fractures of other complications. This length of time on the operating table can lead to excessive blood loss, infection and a much longer recovery time—six weeks or more. Many orthopedic surgeons will not perform a Rejuvenate revision simply because it is so difficult and so risky for the patient. So, while the Rejuvenate may not cause the high levels of cobalt and chromium in the blood, it nonetheless can cause corrosion and metal ions to enter the bloodstream. In the event a revision surgery is necessary, the dangers increase significantly.
Print
0 Comments
Please login or register to post comments.

WARNING: Do not send any information in any email through this website if you consider the information confidential or privileged.

I understand that by submitting my contact information to Sullo & Sullo LLP for review, I consent to messages regarding this legal matter as well as marketing for other potential legal matters in the future without limitation at standard messaging and data rates unless terminated by me in writing. I further understand that my submission of any and all information in response to this website does NOT create a lawyer-client relationship between myself and Sullo & Sullo, LLP and/or its lawyers, and that any and all information submitted is NOT confidential or privileged. I further acknowledge that, unless Sullo & Sullo, LLP subsequently enters into an Attorney-Client relationship with me, any and all information I provide will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged, and any such information may be used against me and/or for the benefit of current or future clients of Sullo & Sullo, LLP. ...READ ENTIRE DISCLAIMER
Receive an Immediate Response
ANDREW SULLO IS A TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019
Obtener una Respuesta Inmediata
Andrew Sullo – 100 Mejores Abogados Nacional | 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017


4.6/5.0

STARS ON YELP
WITH OVER 400 REVIEWS*

*AS OF 2024



Andrew Sullo has been named a

TOP 100 NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYER*
2013-2024

*BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS

 

CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 839-9026 CALL NOW FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION (713) 335-9485


Andrew Sullo is a recipient of the

AVVO CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD*
2016, 2017, 2019-2024

*GIVEN BY AVVO


Justice

Andrew Sullo is a Member of the

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUSTICE
2013-2024

*GRANTED BY THE AAJ

 

IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE WERE SERIOUSLY INJURED DUE TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANOTHER, CONTACT SULLO & SULLO IMMEDIATELY.
CALL NOW
(800) 730-7607
CALL NOW
(713) 839-9026
CALL NOW
(713) 335-9485

GET LEGAL HELP