Is Baby Powder with Talc Dangerous?
After some early studies in the early 1930s, 1971, and the 1980s and 90s that indicated a definite link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, the Federal National Toxicology Program issued a report which found “clear evidence of carcinogenic activity of talc.” By 1996, the condom industry had removed talc from all products in response to ovarian cancer concerns—yet Johnson & Johnson continued selling its talc-based products with no warnings to women. In 2006, major talc suppliers put toxicity warnings of shipments of talc to manufacturers—yet Johnson & Johnson refused to warn women of the possible dangers of using talc-based products for feminine hygiene.
In 2011, the Cramer Study—a ten-year, case-control study—found that women who had used talcum powder in the genital region long term had a two-thirds increase in the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson continued selling talc-based products until May 2020, when the company discontinued production of Johnson & Johnson baby powder with talc in the United States and Canada. The reasoning behind this decision was the barrage of lawsuits faced over the past decade and a drop in sales.
Where Does the Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Litigation in Cheyenne, Wyoming Stand?
The first lawsuit against J & J was filed by Deane Berg in 2009 after she refused a confidential settlement from Johnson & Johnson. While the jury found in favor of Berg, she received no monetary award. In the ensuing years, several more women or their families received sizeable awards, but J & J appealed each of those decisions. In 2018, 22 women who filed a joint case against J & J received an award in the billions. While J & J also appealed that decision, it was upheld in June 2020 by a Missouri Appeals Court. Johnson & Johnson has vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court. Many of the nearly 20,000 pending baby powder ovarian cancer lawsuits against J & J were filed by women who live in the state of Wyoming.
Has J & J Baby Powder with Talc Been Recalled in the U.S.?
As a potentially inflammatory agent which can reach the upper genital tract, and given that talc was, in 2006, declared “possibly carcinogenic,” by the IARC, you might wonder why the FDA never recalled talc-based products. So, while no recalls were ordered by the FDA, that actually has more to do with the fact that the agency has little control over health products and cosmetics—which is where talcum powder resides.
Have the Statutes of Limitations Passed for My Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Case In Cheyenne, Wyoming?
If you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after using J & J’s talc-based products you may have a baby powder ovarian cancer lawsuit. The statutes of limitations are an important consideration in product liability and personal injury claims. The statutes of limitation govern the amount of time a plaintiff has to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer of a dangerous or defective product. These statutes vary from state to state, from one year to more than ten years. It is important to realize, however, that the statutes can be impacted by a number of issues so you should always speak to a knowledgeable baby powder ovarian cancer attorney before making any decision.
How Could Consulting with a Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawyer for Your Cheyenne, Wyoming Case Be Beneficial?
If you have been diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer after using J & J talc-based products for feminine hygiene, you could benefit from speaking to an experienced Sullo & Sullo baby powder ovarian cancer lawyer. Our Houston attorneys will answer all your questions, then comprehensively assess your unique case. We will work hard to ensure you get the treatment you need while ensuring your rights and your future are properly protected.